Setting a budget for the coming year will likely dominate City Council discussions locally and statewide in the coming weeks and months. Department heads and local organizations are currently making …
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, below, or purchase a new subscription.
Please log in to continue |
Setting a budget for the coming year will likely dominate City Council discussions locally and statewide in the coming weeks and months. Department heads and local organizations are currently making their case for ongoing financial support or allowances in meetings as decisions for next year have to be made.
But it’s a challenging time for local governments to project what next year’s budget might look like as a statewide initiative potentially threatens to gut the revenue communities across the state rely on through sales taxes.
“IM28 is a big discussion for cities right now,” said Cohl Turnquist, City Administrator in Flandreau, to the Moody County Enterprise. A discussion on the initiated measure was presented before the local City Council this past week.
Initiated Measure 28, scheduled to be on the November ballot and decided on by voters, would prohibit a state sales tax on anything sold for human consumption, except alcoholic beverages or prepared food.
The initiative defines prepared food as food that is sold heated or with utensils, but there are still many unanswered questions as to what might fall under the measure. Under Initiative Measure 28, local governments would not be prohibited from levying a tax, but there are major concerns about how the measure is worded and what the ultimate impact might be.
City and town officials statewide believe the measure will eliminate tax dollars traditionally used for the upkeep and maintenance of roads, infrastructure, and necessities, let alone all of the requests that come in annually from organizations, entities, and initiatives each community might want to support and grow.
Proponents of the measure believe it is fair and overdue, as it eliminates a tax on some of those that can’t afford it most. A majority of other states across the nation have eliminated the tax.
Opponents worry that basic services will be cut because there won’t be funds available, or if they are to remain available, they’ll have to come through another source.